Tag Archives: Army of Darkness

Movie Review: Evil Dead (Remake)

Last night, I went to see the Evil Dead remake and I was less than impressed.

For those that don’t know, the original The Evil Dead is a horror cult classic that exists in its own realm of awesome. It is a frantic, kinetic, slapstick gore-tastic explosion of excess. The sequels that followed are less innovative, but far more fun and added more to the sub-layers of pop culture than the first. The first was a horror movie that was as much informed by the Three Stooges as it was by George Romero and drive-in horror flicks.

The remake was, in a lot of ways, going to fail before it even got out of the gate. You cannot, absolutely cannot, remake the magic that makes a cult movie a cult movie. And nor do you want to. A cult movie is popular with only a small portion of the movie-going audience, hence the name. The studio is not going to go out of their way to try and please a very cranky, persnickety cluster of fans.

So the remake was far less frantic, more reserved and more by-the-numbers, more tailored for the average Friday night ticket holder. It followed closely along in the footsteps of the original movie and every “cabin in the woods” formula movie that followed.

But the more I thought about it, the more I began to consider the idea that the remake was, in a sly way, tapping into the same ideas that the first The Evil Dead did. It was violent. Ridiculously so. Almost Black Knight violent. It even made me wince once or thrice. Much in the way the first The Evil Dead reveled in the gooshy red stuff, the remake over-indulged as well, but catered to an audience that has been emotionally stunted on a steady diet of Saw and Hostel movies.

And as it progressed, Evil Dead became steadily more over the top and more absurd. At the time, when I saw duct tape routinely used as the cure-all for injuries, including, but not limited to, a severed arm, I thought that there was a very desperate or very ignorant screenwriter at play. But now, in retrospect, I think there were just screenwriters at play, trying to tread a very careful line between the goofy, over-the-top slapstick violence of every horror movie from the 80′s and the grim, ultra real, ultra gritty torture horror that has come to, disturbingly, dominate the market in the last ten years.

I hesitate to call Evil Dead a good movie, but I am willing to give it more credit than I initially gave it. If you’re a fan of the original or of 80′s horror in general (Hello Re-Aimator fans), give it a spin, keep an open mind and see it as an amalgam of the now and then.

I give it one, over-amorous tree.

-D-

3 Comments

Filed under Horror

Laugh or Die: Entry IV

Comedy and Horror have a lot in common. Both are about building tension until the audience can’t take it any more and react in one of two ways: they either laugh or scream.

With this in mind, one might think that it’s easy to combine the two. Historically, it’s happened. Scream, Army of Darkness, Return of the Living Dead, Fargo; these are all movies with strong thriller or horror elements but that also managed to be funny. But these are exceptions to the rule. For every, genuinely funny and creepy horror movie, there are countless movies out there that have failed at both.

For example, in recent years there were two prime horror comedies: Dylan Dog: Dead of Night and The Cabin in the Woods. One of them was an abysmal failure and the other was a great commentary on the horror genre.

Dylan Dog was based on the fantastic Italian horror comic about a detective who investigated supernatural crimes. It was a surreal comic, where the humor was based on truly bizarre situations. It was brilliant and I recommend it heartily to people who enjoy weird. The movie, on the other hand, resorted to cheap gags, when it could be bothered to do anything beyond boring. It would not, or could not, take any risks, which is key for a movie to be either scary or funny. If there is no tension, then there’s nothing. You’re not scared and you’re not laughing.

With either genre, you can’t shy away from tension; you can’t steer clear of things that make people uncomfortable. It is that discomfort that makes either genre successful. Which is why The Cabin in the Woods is a better movie. Rather than watering down the horror, they embrace it. Every bit of true, awful nightmare makes the humor that much funnier. You laugh to relieve the tension.

The Cabin in the Woods is an exercise in the balance between tension and release, why Dylan Dog: Dead of Night is a perfect example of the writer and the director playing it too safe and killing any chance of the audience laughing or screaming.

1 Comment

Filed under Movies